Have you guys seen the headlines? There is a lot of buzz about the new Canadian legislature which seeks to provide stay-at-home parents with “workplace equity and safety” under a proposed revision to the Employment Standards Act.
Currently according to Ontario labour law:
- An employee must not work for more than five hours in a row without getting a 30-minute eating period (meal break) free from work.
- The maximum number of hours most employees can be required to work in a day is eight hours, any additional hours must be voluntary and must be compensated by overtime.
- An employee must have 11 consecutive hours free from work in each 24 hour period (aka can’t work more then 13 hours in a given day).
- An employee has the right to sick days, compassionate leave, and “mental health days”, aka 10 paid days of personal leave per year.
In this case the argument is being made that the employer of the stay at home mom or dad is in essence the government, in which case it is the responsibility of the Ontario government to begin offering the same basic workplace standards to full-time parents as they do to paid child-care workers.
If it passes this new bill would see the government hiring a “nanny force” to step in and provide the legally required breaks. That’s right, Ontario parents could see a government paid “nanny” stopping in at their home up to three times a day for 15-45 minute periods to provide breaks. While on the premise these child-care workers would only be responsible for the welfare of the children. They would not be allowed to take part in food preparation or other household chores.
Under the new law stay at home moms or dads would be able to apply for “sick leave coverage”. There would be a limit on the number of sick days a year that a parents can apply for coverage for, and a doctors note would be required as well.
The proposed bill would only cover “full-time” parents, those that report under $8000 in income on their taxes. As well, it would only cover those whose children are not yet eligible to attend full time school. Basically if you currently qualify for the $100 per child a month “day care” bonus from the government, you would qualify under this new program.
There is also some talk of looking into workplace biohazard safety regulations as they apply to “bodily fluids”, and applying them to the homefront.
This is an election issue folks! What are your thoughts?
For more info you can read up on it HERE.
Image 1: THENANNYTIMEBOMB, Wikimedia.
Image 2: Anna Gutermuth, Flickr.
Image 3: William Brawley, Flickr.
Image 4: meddygarnet, Flickr.
Image 5: Sean MacEntee, Flickr.
As a fellow Ontarian, I would love to share this with my friends! Of course, I would link back to this post. Is that ok, with you?
I'm in Alberta and currently on mat leave. Does this not seem crazy to anyone else?? I mean, I'd love to get a "lunch break" but wouldn't the cost of this make the entire idea completely unfeasible? Isn't the prohibitive cost of daycare/nannies, etc. exactly why some of those parents are at home in the first place? My kids aren't my "job", they're my joy, my life and entirely my responsibility…not my governments.
Okay, I just thought about it — April Fools. Totally fell for it. Must finish drinking my coffee!!
interesting!!!!
I totally fell for this too. I thought it sounded kind of unrealistic and forwarded it to my husband, and he wrote back and said it was for April Fool's. Ha,ha! Good one!
Hahaha! I totally believed it too! I was thinking "whaaaat?" LOL! You're goood! 😀
I'm so glad I was able to fool a few of you. >;-PI'm with you Paula,my kids are my responsibilities, and not the governments. Heck, I'm still in the air over whether or not to enroll G-Girl in JK. This was definitely not a wish fulfillment post, I would hate to have someone coming into my house. Yuck. Though sick days, damn, I could use one of those.
you are brilliant!